https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:3794 Wed 11 Apr 2018 15:59:10 AEST ]]> Mismatch negativity and P50 sensory gating in abstinent former cannabis users https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:24730 Wed 11 Apr 2018 13:46:39 AEST ]]> Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:3793 Go effects were observed, and the P3 but not the N2 showed an Invalid > Valid effect. Conclusions: The P3, rather than the N2, reflects the inhibition of a planned response and/or the conflict between competing responses. Significance: The findings suggest the need for a major review of current interpretations of the N2 and P3 in inhibitory tasks.]]> Wed 11 Apr 2018 09:41:46 AEST ]]> Chronic effects of cannabis on sensory gating https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:19068 Sat 24 Mar 2018 08:05:19 AEDT ]]> Development of inhibitory processing during the Go/Nogo task a behavioral and event-related potential study of children and adults https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:3775 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:21:44 AEDT ]]> The development of stop-signal and Go/Nogo response inhibition in children aged 7–12 years: performance and event-related potential indices https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:3766 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:20:52 AEDT ]]> Aiding diagnosis of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and its subtypes: discriminant function analysis of event-related potential data https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:3789 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:18:40 AEDT ]]> Inhibitory processing during the Go/NoGo task: an ERP analysis of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:3791 Go effect was found, consistent with previous work linking this component with inhibitory processing. In control children this effect was particularly strong in the right frontal region, while children with AD/HD showed a much larger NoGo>Go effect, and an earlier N2 peak, than controls, with a focal shift to the left frontal region. Conclusions: Compared with normal controls, children with AD/HD demonstrate early stimulus processing atypicalities, suggesting problems with sensory registration and identification of stimuli. Further, N2 results suggest that children with AD/HD must trigger the inhibition process earlier and more strongly than controls to perform at a comparable behavioural level. Significance: The results support the theory that behavioural inhibition is deficient in AD/HD, as children with AD/HD show abnormalities in inhibitory ERP components relating to the effort involved in inhibiting a prepotent response.]]> Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:18:39 AEDT ]]>